Enslaved are the men as is the Cow or the Hen

Sex is biologically attached to one’s person more than is money because money (government currency) is a medium that liquidates one’s person in the case of men, separating it from one’s personal/individual existence. Slavery is an example of this as female assets are sex and domestics, a man’s being enslaved for labor.

Much like the cow from which milk is taken, she continues to lactate until she finally dries up and is then slaughtered for hamburger, or the chicken that keeps laying eggs because she can never accumulate enough eggs to set and, when finally spent and can no longer lay any more eggs, is slaughtered as an old stew hen. Is this not the way men are used in society concerning their biological assets converted to government currency? Is this not seen in attaching a continual debt to many fathers who are deliberatly deprived their children and must pay more child support because of their forced separation, much like the way the cow or chicken is used? (It’s a people farm in which no care is necessary by the farmer–in fact, hypocritically, more jobs and employment opportunities are provided to women by the same government.) Fatherhood is tapped and exploited by the government as fathers are literally enslaved.

It’s ironic that we often hear women complain about this effect applying to female animals (per animal rights activism) but they have no problem applying the same practice to men.

The dating/mating process is set up the same way as to how men are treated. And the female’s assets are not only protected more than ever but weaponized against men. As men’s personal assets via money is taken, sex is shared by a woman’s choice. Women have retained their personal agency whereas men have not–instead tapped, exploited and enslaved as a matter of fact via women and the government (in the case of state-defined child support and alimony). Slavery, yes, but we just don’t call it that by the use (cover) of children and reproduction to do it. Insidious!

As women have claimed they have slaved for men, they lie, because they equally choose to marry and have a family as do men. That’s a free choice, not slavery. However, slavery IS forced upon men who ARE bound to serve women via a misandric government that is not part of the family. If women did anything exclusively for men, this condition would not change after they are separated let alone be something implemented at men’s expense. No, instead women, with the government, enslave men via reproduction (much like the cow or chicken mentioned above) due to the children these women also (often exclusively) choose to have.

Men DO NOT choose to be enslaved by the government at women’s discretion, deprived of contact with their children ‘justifying’ the forced detached arrangement for money. Men strive for the family whereas women strive only for themselves via the government’s thug support, using and exploiting their own children to do it. As for the child, if both sexes had equal billing, the father would be able to provide for his child directly and thus have the same status as the mother, owing the mother (or the government affiliated) nothing.

A pre-equal employment opportunity mindset still prevails, taking a sentiment of the past when women didn’t have the same ability to acquire the financial assets as men and illegitimately applying it to the present that places more financial burdens on the father. Men as fathers are already owned by the state so all child support is required to go through the state’s hands, now with more expenses (additional fees) added on to the coerced arrangement (‘service’ provided). Besides the state further benefiting from this, the federal government gives millions to state governments yearly to implement this demented process. Compare this to a government first created for this country that operated by politicians first volunteering their time as a privilege to serve the people.